This is an open thought that I need to get off my chest. Lately, Iโve noticed a growing expectation. Sometimes direct, sometimes implied, that I handle code violations differently based on who the property owner is, what neighborhood itโs in, or how the situation might be perceived politically. I want to be clear: I didnโt take this job to play politics. I took it to enforce the law fairly, objectively, and by the book. I also like to build a positive relationship with the community, but playing politics undermines day to day operations. Our city has adopted ordinances rooted in the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) for a reason, to protect property values, safeguard health and safety, and ensure a consistent standard for everyone. The Georgia Association of Code Enforcement emphasizes impartiality and professionalism in all enforcement actions, regardless of external pressure. Thatโs what builds real trust between the public and city government. When political influence starts creeping into how we apply the code, it creates real problems. If city council members, or anyone in leadership, start making decisions based on personal connections or political agendas instead of ordinance and due process, it sends a message to the public that the rules donโt apply equally. It also sends the message that some people get special treatment, while others get overlooked or targeted. Over time, this erodes community trust and leads to resentment, especially in neighborhoods that already feel ignored or underserved. If we start enforcing the law inconsistently, what exactly are we telling the next officer, the next department head, or the next resident who asks why their complaint wasnโt handled the same way? It undermines the credibility of not just our department, but the city as a whole. And worse, it opens the city up to claims of selective enforcement, discrimination, or even lawsuits. All because we didnโt follow our own rules. Georgia law (O.C.G.A. ยง 36-74-30) is clear: code enforcement is to be handled fairly and without bias. Political agendas donโt change the ordinance. They donโt dictate due process, and they shouldnโt steer how we do our jobs. When that line gets blurred, itโs not just bad policy, itโs a disservice to the entire community. I bring this forward not to stir the pot, but because I believe in the work we do and want to see it done right. If thereโs a change in how weโre expected to operate, or if political concerns are going to take priority over consistent enforcement, I think thatโs a conversation that needs to happen openly. Iโm committed to doing my job with integrity, and I just want to make sure Iโm not being asked to compromise that for the sake of politics.